The Era of Decline: Between Truth and Claim

Authors

  • محمد أحمد عبد الله الزهيري Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69844/7jer1856

Keywords:

Decline, era of decline, misconceptions, preconceived judgments

Abstract

#The research aims to discuss the accusation leveled against the Mamluk and Ottoman eras, labeling them as periods of decline. The research adopts an inductive methodology and is divided into three sections: the key criticisms of this era from literary and cultural perspectives, the manifestations of prosperity, and the causes of misconceptions. The research concludes with the findings and recommendations. The key findings indicate that the judgment on a historical period encompassing the Mamluk and Ottoman eras as a period of decline is not scientifically or historically accurate. Such a judgment obscures the achievements of approximately six centuries of Arab and Islamic civilization and culture, extending from the fall of Baghdad to the Mongols in 656 AH to the fall of Egypt to the French in 1213 AH. This period represents half of our Islamic history, which witnessed the greatest accomplishments in the humanities and natural sciences.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2006

How to Cite

The Era of Decline: Between Truth and Claim. (2006). The University Researcher Journal of Human Sciences, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.69844/7jer1856

Similar Articles

11-20 of 90

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.